《Meta分析的SCI写作模板》整个系列今天就全部结束了。其实上期我们介绍完文章中的讨论部分,Meta分析的主体部分就已经介绍完了。今天再给大家补上Conclusions部分。 另外,我们实用Meta分析近期推出Meta分析在线公开课(腾讯课堂),内容见下面的“公告通知”,具体的报名流程和内容会在我们下周的公共账号中介绍。
①In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that ××× are associated with ××× in the ×××population. Larger sample sizes of different ethnic populations are required to confirm our findings.
②This meta-analysis indicates that ×××. Nevertheless, despite our rigorous methodology, the inherent limitations of included studies prevent us from reaching definitive conclusions. Future large-volume, well-designed RCTs with extensive follow-up are awaited to confirm and update the findings of this analysis.
③While the evidence that ××× may be an effective treatment for ××× is encouraging, it is not conclusive due to the low methodological quality of the RCTs. Therefore, more high-quality RCTs, with low risk of bias and adequate sample sizes, are required to demonstrate its true effects. |
呕血整理-Meta分析的SCI写作模板—Conclusions
阳雨
收藏于 : 2019-01-19 08:48 被转藏 : 1
特别重申:本篇文档资料为 “好网角收藏夹” 注册用户(收藏家)上传共享,仅供参考之用,请谨慎辨别,不代表本站任何观点。
好网角收藏夹为网友提供资料整理云存储服务,仅提供信息存储共享平台。
如发现不良信息删除、涉嫌侵权,请 点击这里举报 ,或发送邮件到:dongye2016qq.com。
如发现不良信息删除、涉嫌侵权,请 点击这里举报 ,或发送邮件到:dongye2016qq.com。